Sigatoka River saga

The stockpile of sand that has also resulted in the drying up of trees and vegetation along the Sigatoka River is not from the exploration works being carried out by Magma Mines but it is from dredging works conducted by China Railway Company between 2016 to 2018 for flood mitigation.

The briefing from the Permanent Secretary for Waterways, Joshua Wycliffe to the Prime Minister confirms that dredged materials were dumped on the approved dump sites through the Environmental Impact Assessment process and upon the mataqali giving consent to dump on their land.

In his briefing Wycliffe said that due to the sand materials, the existing greens has died and will naturally rejuvenate its greens over a lapse of time. He says this was the same practice and have rejuvenated greens for the Rewa River, Navua River, Nadi River, Ba River and Labasa River dredging projects.

He says the Sigatoka River dredging project was planned under the Land and Water Resource Management Division then under Ministry of Agriculture in 2016 to 2018.

The Permanent Secretary for Waterways says the dredging was totally for flood mitigation purposes to protect and safeguard communities from risks of flooding and protect the valley vegetable farmers known as the ‘Salad Bowl of Fiji” from risks of flooding and surrounding communities/villages and town.

You can check out the video of the dredging works by China Railway Company taken by Department of Information in June 2018.

Wycliffe says after the regulatory requirements were met like – the EIA approval from Department of Environment,  the waiver of fishing rights, the Director of Lands Approval and the approval from landowners for use of land to dump dredged material - the tender was advertised and the government tender board approved ‘China Railway Company’ to undertake the dredging project.

Environment Minister Speaks On Sigatoka River Situation

Minister for Waterways, Agriculture and Environment, Doctor Mahendra Reddy confirms the site in Sigatoka which was visited by Opposition parliamentarians yesterday was the site for the Sigatoka River Dredging project.

It is the site where sand that was being dredged from the river was being dumped.

Reddy says they dumped the sand on the site where the villagers agreed but villagers then said they did not want it there so the dredging stopped.

He says their officers went to the site today to conduct checks.

/p>

When asked about the damage to the trees and vegetation at the site where the sand was being dumped, Reddy said they will need to examine that.

When further asked about the 900 people that signed SODELPA MP Viliame Gavoka’s petition being concerned about their food sources, Reddy said people that have concerns should go to the Ministry of Environment.

Gavoka refutes claims that they got landowners to sign on blank paper and took photos of dredging site

SODELPA MP, Viliame Gavoka says it is pathetic for the Minister for Lands and Minerals Resources, Ashneel Sudhakar to say that some landowners were given blank papers to sign and that they had no idea it was a petition for SODELPA.

This is after Sudhakar claimed that the photos that are now circulating from Sigatoka are not from the actual exploration site at the Sigatoka River Mouth but from somewhere else, and he also claims that some landowners have told them that they were told to sign on blank paper, not knowing it was a petition for SODELPA.

When questioned on this by Fijivillage, Gavoka claims their petition followed the law.

Although no mining lease has been issued to Magma, Gavoka says mining in the area will involve around 131 million tonnes of sand, something which Fiji has never seen and it is something that can totally change Sigatoka.

However, Sudhakar stresses that consultations were done with the villagers before exploration works began.

He says the 7 villages who have signed the petition were also part of the consultation on several occasions and maintains that they had no objections.

Sudhakar says the license is only given when 60% or more of the landowners are in agreement.

Sudhakar also says that some villagers have approached them with claims that they were asked to sign on blank paper and had no idea that they were signing a petition.

Sudhakar says that tests are done by his team every 3 months to ensure that the water and fish around the exploration site are safe and there have been no issues so far.

He says landowners can only oppose the license when consultations are done and the license can then only be cancelled by the Ministry when the company breaches the contract.

Sudhakar says landowners cannot just turn up to them all of a sudden and ask for the license to be cancelled.

He says the company also has to pay a bond to the Ministry, which is paid to the landowners as compensation if any damage is done to the ground.

Minister for Lands and Mineral Resources, Ashneel Sudhakar says the photos that are now circulating from Sigatoka are not from the actual exploration site at the Sigatoka River Mouth but from somewhere else, and he also claims that some landowners have told them that they were told to sign on blank paper, not knowing it was a petition for SODELPA.

While speaking on the exploration works for magnetite by Magma Mines near the Sigatoka River Mouth, Sudhakar stresses that consultations were done with the villagers before exploration works began.

He says the 7 villages who have signed the petition were also part of the consultation on several occasions and maintains that they had no objections.

Sudhakar says the license is only given when 60% or more of the landowners are in agreement.

Sudhakar also says that some villagers have approached them with claims that they were asked to sign on blank paper and had no idea that they were signing a petition.

Sudhakar says that tests are done by his team every 3 months to ensure that the water and fish around the exploration site are safe and there have been no issues so far.

He says landowners can only oppose the license when consultations are done and the license can then only be cancelled by the Ministry when the company breaches the contract.

Sudhakar says landowners cannot just turn up to them all of a sudden and ask for the license to be cancelled.

He says the company also has to pay a bond to the Ministry, which is paid to the landowners as compensation if any damage is done to the ground.

Exploration Works At The Sigatoka River Mouth

The Lands and Mineral Resources Minister, Ashneel Sudhakar says Magma Mines which is carrying out exploration works for magnetite at the Sigatoka River Mouth since 2007 has complied with its exploration Environment Management Plan and has also obtained relevant landowners support within their exploration footprint area, which is predominantly the Tikina o Nasigatoka.

In a brief to the Prime Minister yesterday, Sudhakar also says that only during the mining lease application stage, is when the landowners’ approval is required for the issuance of a surface lease over a particular area that is targeted for mining. He confirms that this is an intensive consultative and multi-stakeholder engagement process as landowners’ approval for the award of a surface lease forfeits their right to land area for the lease term.

It has been confirmed that Magma Mines has only received an exploration license, and no mining lease has been issued to the company.

The Lands Minister says Magma is currently undertaking exploration and has not yet determined the discovery of a mineable resource.

He says iron sand mining on the riverbed is similar to the all familiar river dredging.

Sudhakar also says Magma Mines, since it began exploration in Sigatoka, has held numerous landowner/community consultations in terms of the nature of its exploration works with the support of the Nadroga Provincial Office.

The Minister says there is also some misconception in associating Magma Mines exploration activities with the recent dredging of the Sigatoka River for flood mitigation, which was done in 2017. Sudhakar says Magma Mines has its own exploration techniques to obtain mineral samples for scientific analysis thus, the assumption in the petition that Magma Mines was dependent on the 2017 river dredging activity to extract mineral samples is baseless.

He says any company with a valid exploration license operating in Fiji is permitted to extract and send mineral samples overseas for scientific analysis rather than monetary gain.

Sudhakar says the Department issues mineral export permits for mineral sample export and as such, this is undertaken in a controlled and well-regulated environment.

However he says Magma Mines had proposed to the Ministry to undertake mineral extraction (dredging) once the company identifies a mineable resource for mining.

Sudhakar says given the necessity of flood mitigation dredging which is of national interest, the 2017 dredging of the Sigatoka River was prioritized.

The Minister says in his brief that there was no collusion between Magma Mines and China Railway which was the company tasked with the 2017 river dredging; given the differing nature of the two projects.

Sudhakar says China Railway was engaged by the then Land and Water Resources Management Department which is now embedded within the Ministry of Waterways and Environment. They say this was for flood mitigation purposes. 

He says while the Ministry of Lands is not in a position to comment on China Railway’s dredging activities, he can confirm that Magma Mines was not involved whatsoever in China Railway’s operations.

China Railway’s flood mitigation dredging works was a government-funded project whereas mineral exploration is undertaken and self-funded by private entities.

Sudhakar says Magma Mines commissioned a preliminary Environment Impact Assessment study in 2016 as part of its mining pre-feasibility study with six public consultations undertaken in 2017 in Sigatoka.

The Lands Minister says approved EIA consultants registered with the Ministry of Environment carried out the preliminary EIA study and public consultations were held incorporating discussions between the company, communities and government departments such as Department of Environment, Mineral Resources Department and Fisheries.

Sudhakar also says when the project advances to a full feasibility study stage, Magma will be required to undertake a full EIA study as part of permitting requirements. 

He also says that under Section 11 of the Mining Act 1965, there are certain areas closed to prospecting, no matter the extent of the projected mineral prospectivity of the tenement. Such areas are namely are iTaukei Village, burial grounds, villages or residential areas, farms and any land within town boundaries and reserved land for infrastructural development, water supply sources and reserved forest etc.

Sudhakar says the Department of Mines also undertakes periodic consultations with all landowners on whose land mineral exploration is being undertaken to carry out awareness on the law (Mining Act) that govern mineral exploration and mining as well as landowner rights and company rights pertaining to mineral exploration and mining.

In terms of concerns for future generations, Sudhakar says government is focused on sustainable mineral exploration and mining practices that will ensure that any project achieves environmental, social and economic balance.  

He says there were also claims of health problems caused by mineral dust. Sudhakar says any environmental issues which may give rise to health concerns will be addressed via the Environmental Impact Assessment process if Magma Mines applies for a mining lease.

The Lands Minister says it is imperative that landowners and communities actively participate in the EIA process, including public consultations, to raise any concerns with relevant agencies involved in the EIA process. 

Sudhakar says Fiji and the Prime Minister’s active involvement in the Conference of Parties (COP) clearly articulate the current government’s intention to promote and harness sustainable development. He says this sentiment is embraced by the Ministry in its efforts to ensure sustainable mineral exploration and mining practices. 

People that have signed SODLEPA MP, Viliame Gavoka’s petition to parliament are from the villages of Nayawa, Laselase, Yavulo, Sigatoka, Nasama, Vunavutu, Volivoli and Kulukulu.

They are calling for effective and not just in-name consultations to be held before any decision is made on the mining lease by the Minister for Lands.

However Sudhakar says several consultation sessions have been held with the landowners from 2012.

Gavoka says these communities are deeply concerned for their future welfare not to mention the environmental impact of the mine. He says some may be forced to leave their homes.

Gavoka says this will negatively affect their livelihoods and deprive them of ancestral fishing grounds as a result of the destruction of the environment.

The petition was not allowed by the Speaker of Parliament as he said that parliament does not have the jurisdiction to look into the issue.

We will get comments from Environment Minister, Doctor Mahendra Reddy later today.

Minister for Lands and Mineral Resources, Ashneel Sudhakar stresses that no mining lease can encroach onto an iTaukei village, their settlement or their traditional fishing ground, and they cannot relocate a village for mining or exploration purposes.

While speaking on the exploration works for magnetite by Magma Mines near the Sigatoka River Mouth, Sudhakar says there has been regular consultations with the villagers in the area he believes that they have either been instigated or not been told the facts by the opposition.

He says nobody is being removed from the site because at this moment the exploration is going on and when they find the mineral, then they will go down and see which part can be leased.

He says when a exploration license is given to a company, they are only given permission to explore and not start digging and removing minerals.

Sudhakar says if the company sees potential for mineral, then they apply for a mining lease after which a marked area is given to them and they are not allowed to go beyond that.

Sudhakar has also assured Fijians that these projects are in the best interest of the people, and the consultations have been going on with the landowners at every stage from 2015.

People that have signed SODLEPA MP, Viliame Gavoka’s petition to parliament are from the villages of Nayawa, Laselase, Yavulo, Sigatoka, Nasama, Vunavutu, Volivoli and also the Kulukulu area.

They are calling for effective and not just in-name consultations to be held before any decision is made on the mining lease by Sudhakar.

Magma Mines is exploring for magnetite which is a source of iron for making steel.

Gavoka says these communities are deeply concerned for their future welfare not to mention the environmental impact of the mine.

He says some may be forced to leave their homes.

Gavoka says this will negatively affect their livelihoods and deprive them of ancestral fishing grounds as a result of the destruction of the environment.

The petition had stated that the proposed mining area covers 2522.69 hectares.

Gavoka was hoping parliament will set-up one of its committees, to hold hearings with all stakeholders, and submit findings to parliament.

The petition was not allowed by the Speaker of Parliament as he said that parliament does not have the jurisdiction to look into the issue.

The Fijian government says Magma Mines Limited does not hold a mining lease but currently holds an exploration license for the lower end of the Sigatoka River, towards the Sigatoka river mouth.

The full briefing to the Prime Minister, Voreqe Bainimarama provided by Lands and Mineral Resources Minister, Ashneel Sudhakar, says since 2007, Magma Mines has not done any mining on the Sigatoka riverbed as the project is still in its exploration phase.

Sudhakar says Magma Mines since it began exploration in Sigatoka, has held numerous landowners and community consultations in terms of the nature of its exploration work with the support of the Nadroga Provincial Office.

Sudhakar says, in addition, the Mineral Resources Department’s Community Unit has also undertaken awareness programs within the Tikina O Nasigatoka.

The Ministry renewed Magma Mines exploration licence last year again for a 3 year term, expiring in 2022.

Sudhakar says mineral ownership remains vested in the State and the Mineral Resources Department, as the regulatory arm of government, grants mineral exploration licenses to reputable companies on the understanding that these companies will undertake meaningful and progressive mineral exploration works.

People that have signed SODLEPA MP, Viliame Gavoka’s petition to parliament are from the villages of Nayawa, Laselase, Yavulo, Sigatoka, Nasama, Vunavutu, Volivoli and also the Kulukulu area.

They are calling for effective and not just in-name consultations to be held before any decision is made on the mining lease by the Minister for Lands and Mineral Resources, Ashneel Sudhakar.

Magma Mines is exploring for magnetite which is a source of iron for making steel.

Gavoka says these communities are deeply concerned for their future welfare not to mention the environmental impact of the mine.

He says some may be forced to leave their homes.

Gavoka says this will negatively affect their livelihoods and deprive them of ancestral fishing grounds as a result of the destruction of the environment.

The petition had stated that the proposed mining area covers 2522.69 hectares.

However in his brief to Bainimarama, the Lands Minister says this area is actually Magma Mines exploration license area.

He says exploration companies zero in on most prospective zones within the exploration license area.

Sudhakar says once a viable or mineable resource is defined, the company will then apply for a mining lease within the exploration license area, which would obviously be far less than that the exploration area itself.

Sudhakar says Magma is currently undertaking exploration and has not yet determined the discovery of a mineable resource.

Gavoka was hoping parliament will set-up one of its Committees, to hold hearings with all stakeholders, and submit findings to parliament.

The petition was not allowed by the Speaker of Parliament as he said that parliament does not have the jurisdiction to look into the issue.