Changes need to be made to the Online Safety Bill before it returns to parliament - NFP

Changes need to be made to the Online Safety Bill before it returns to parliament - NFP

By Vijay Narayan
27/03/2018

The National Federation Party says changes need to be made to the Online Safety Bill before it returns to parliament, and the Parliamentary Committee should be given 6 months to have thorough consultations.

While presenting their submission to the Committee On Justice, Law and Human Rights, NFP’s Vice President, Seini Nabou said that the bill in it’s current form is very unclear and murky.

Nabou says the bill does not define responsible online behaviour and as Fiji heads to the polls this year, it is absolutely justified for any political party to be anxious that the chilling of free speech online is at risk.

She says the fine line of balance is a grey area but in the bill, we could come to the point where the grey area is determined by the state.

Nabou says the NFP proposes that the Online Safety Bill adopt the ten Communication Principles from the New Zealand Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 to strengthen what responsible online behaviour means in the bill.

0% buffered00:00Current time00:00

Nabou also says that while the Online Safety Bill purports to protect minors, there will be situations, as has been very recently highlighted in New Zealand media where minors can also commit online offences, such as at Christchurch Boys High School where a student took a photo up a teacher’s skirt and another uploaded a video of a teacher onto a porn website.

She says this is a converse situation, where it is incumbent on the committee to also consider why the bill needs extensive and more thorough consultations with the public.

Nabou also says that while the Online Safety Bill purports to protect minors, there will be situations, as has been very recently highlighted in New Zealand media where minors can also commit online offences, such as at Christchurch Boys High School where a student took a photo up a teacher’s skirt and another uploaded a video of a teacher onto a porn website.

She says this is a converse situation, where it is incumbent on the committee to also consider why the bill needs extensive and more thorough consultations with the public.

Nabou also says that there is no such responsibility placed upon service providers, such as social media service that can compel instant redress or removal of offensive material.

Under the Online Safety Bill, a person who posts an electronic communication with the intention to cause harm to an individual or the position of the individual, commits an offence.

The person who commits an offence is liable upon conviction to - in the case of an individual, a fine not exceeding $20,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or both; and in the case of a company, a fine not exceeding $100,000, and for a director, chief executive officer, manager or officer in charge for the time being, to a fine not exceeding $50,000 or to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 7 years, or both.

In determining whether posting an electronic communication would cause harm, the court may take into account any factor it considers relevant, including the extremity of the language, images or videos used; the age and characteristics of the individual concerned; whether the electronic communication was anonymous; whether the communication was repeated; the extent of circulation of the electronic communication; whether the electronic communication is true or false; and the context in which the electronic communication appeared.

The bill also states that a person must not post or threaten to post an intimate visual recording of an individual. This does not apply if the individual, who is the subject of the electronic

communication concerned, consents to the specific post of the intimate visual recording. In this section in the Online Safety Bill, “consent” must be voluntary, expressed and informed, and does not include the consent of a child.

 

FEATURE NEWS
We want the 2013 Constitution removed – Tu Navitilevu
Liuliu Ni Vanua o Rakiraki, Tu Navitilevu, Ratu Emori Bolobolo says their peaceful march in Rakiraki Town this morning was to call for the removal of ...
3 hours ago
LATEST NEWS
VOU officially launches season 2 of Fijian Flying Circus
Good news as VOU have officially launched the Fijian Flying Circus, Fiji’s own contemporary circus show – a groundbreaking creative venture that ...
57 minutes ago

Expect a magical fun-filled show at the ‘RESFEST’ concert this Saturday - Kuki
Get ready for a magical five-hour experience at the highly anticipated RESFEST concert this Saturday which promises to showcase the incredible depth ...
2 hours ago

No destination is worth a life lost - LTA
No destination is worth a life lost. This is the message from the Land Transport Authority following the tragic death of a woman in her 60s along ...
2 hours ago

NGOs care more than the Government - Kusitina
Villagers of Namosi have raised concerns over the lack of government stakeholders visiting villages in the interior of Namosi and conducting ...
2 hours ago

Nawaikula plans peaceful march on 2013 Constitution in Suva
Former SODELPA parliamentarian and lawyer, Niko Nawaikula is now planning a peaceful march on the 2013 Constitution in Suva. Nawaikula says he as ...
2 hours ago



fijivillage Straight Talk with Vijay Narayan
Latest Videos

Stay tuned for the latest news on our radio stations

CFL radio frequencies
IN DEPTH
Fiji Airways Men’s National 7s coach Osea Kolinisau on fijivillage Straight Talk with Vijay Narayan
Osea Kolinisau on fijivillage Straight Talk with Vijay Narayan
1 day ago

Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum and Vimlesh Sagar’s abuse of office case
Sayed-Khaiyum is charged with one count of abuse of office and one count of general dishonesty causing a loss while Vimlesh Sagar is charged with one ...
1 day ago

Electoral law reform consultations
SoE seeks removal of excessive powers as review of electoral laws ...
2 days ago

TOP